![]() |
| Photo: Joe Paul Cyriac |
The US recently rejected Narendra Modi’s visa application. Yes, even
after he won a third term as Gujarat’s Chief Minister. The Americans
don’t seem to share our mindset of 'elected is legitimate'. For a section
of our people, Modi’s election means Modi’s innocence. The BJP mounts
this cerebral defense time and again. Surprisingly, it found resonance
in the silence of Jagdish Bhagwati.
In
recent ramblings against Amartya Sen’s view of development, Jagdish
Bhagwati offloaded on Sen. He attacked Sen’s personal credentials, while
discerningly keeping his discussion of Modi limited to Gujarat’s
economic growth success. While Sen’s audience was deemed dangerous, Modi
was portrayed as a little girl building an igloo next to the ageing
academic.
Bhagwati
is one of the premier economists of the country. He is read throughout
the country’s intelligentsia. He could have been critical of Modi’s
politics while praising the successes of his neo- liberal policies.
Economics can be debated but killing people is just wrong. Yet, the
ambit of the article was deemed too small by Bhagwati to mention, leave
alone challenge, Modi’s abysmal human rights record.
It
is but the unwillingness of academia to demolish dumb statements that
allows rhetoric like “But then there have been no riots in Gujarat since
2002”, float about. The air with which Modi and company say it, makes
one wonder if it’s a success of the establishment or a favour by the
paid goons of the ruling party who are now supposedly underemployed.
There shouldn’t have been a riot in 2002. The year was not ‘The year of
the Dragon Riot’.
Yet
another defense goes, “You cannot blame Narendra Modi for what the
crowds did”. The center of the chessboard is a difficult place to hide.
Modi placed himself at the very center when he accepted the position of
the state’s chief minister. Such a colossal failure of the state to
maintain law and order is sadly his responsibility. So are the actions
of MLAs in his cabinet like Maya Kodnani who became an arms dealer for The Day.
Modi
is at fault, irrespective of whether charges are proved against his
person. In a time when the man who should have resigned as Chief
Minister 11 years ago is vying for Prime Ministership, the author feels
it behooves academia to critique him vociferously. Bring up the 2002
riots in every discussion on anything about Gujarat- because the man in
the picture cannot.
Aditya is a second year student of the MA in Development Studies programme at TISS, Mumbai.

Nice critique of Modi..Well written
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete:) Well written !
ReplyDelete